Engaging in a “Now Media” Continuum, Part 5
And now, the final video from my MountainRunner Institute talk at the “Now Media Seminar.” Let me know what you thought!
You can also find the slides from this preso by following this link.
And now, the final video from my MountainRunner Institute talk at the “Now Media Seminar.” Let me know what you thought!
You can also find the slides from this preso by following this link.
Here’s Part 4 of my MountainRunner Institute talk from the “Now Media Seminar.” HOWF!
Also, you can follow this link to see the actual slides from the event.
Here’s the third part of my MountainRunner Institute talk from our “Now Media Seminar” on July 6th. Hope you dig!
Here’s the second part of my MountainRunner Institute talk from July 6th’s “Now Media Seminar.” Enjoy!
This past Tuesday, July 6th, 2010, I got the opportunity to speak as part of the MountainRunner Institute’s “Now Media” seminar at the National Press Club. For the less sharp-eyed out there, I’ve been proud to call Matt Armstrong (MRi President and a highly AWESOME blogger) a friend for some time… even before he provided the first forum for Must. Be. AWESOME!!! in its proto-stage. A few months ago, Matt asked me to help him transform his blog, MountainRunner, into a full-fledged nonprofit institute devoted to the study of and conversations about public diplomacy and strategic communication.
One of MRi’s key offerings is a seminar Matt honchos about “Now Media,” his concept of understanding the existing and emerging media environment as it relates to influence and engagement. These seminars give us an opportunity to wrap up everything we learn into something useful for communication practitioners. At this particular event, we had attendees from the U.S. Marine Corps public affairs team, the State Department, and even a contingent of Indonesian bloggers visiting the States on a State Department exchange.
Matt asked me to put together something to capstone the day, integrating everything from his lectures to the examples and information of our guest lecturers. I thought I would present that briefing, “Engaging in a Now Media Continuum,” here for everyone to check out. Accompanying the slideshow is the first of five videos of my actual presentation. I’ll deploy a new chapter of this video series every day for the next five days, so tune in or subscribe to the blog via RSS to get the whole story!
This was my first time presenting on behalf of MountainRunner, so I’d be really interested in everyone’s feedback: What do you think about engaging in a “now media” continuum?
(Note: Special thanks to Rob Watwood for his time and energy discussing the various ideas, thoughts, and challenges that I eventually cobbled together into this preso.)
I figured after all of yesterday’s conversations about the Twitter Gov Liaison position, I figured I owed everybody a “statement of purpose” of some kind for my candidacy. What happened instead, however, involved a broken camera, a bout of nausea, and two very angry cats.
So instead, here’s some “good enough” footage from my FlipCam where I talk about some of my thoughts on the job, the federal government, state and local government, citizens engagement, and a bunch of other stuff.
Thanks for watching.
I mentioned in a prior post that Andrew Wilson had taken the first meaty stab at a list of requirements for the new Twitter Government Liaison. I want to spend time directly addressing his thoughts, because they are true AWESOME gold.
Andrew rightly calls for people to submit and discuss ideas about the Gov Liaison’s duties. His overarching theme though is that those duties are non-political. This seems to fly in the face of Twitter’s original requirements in the job listing, but in actuality, Andrew is trying focus people on the more important issues of connecting citizens to their representatives in DC and at the state and local levels through discussions of open government. Tools are just tools, as Andrew says, and it’s up to us to responsibly figure out how to employ them to the best benefit of everyone.
On to Andrew’s list. (Warning: this will be a longer post than usual.)
1. Please engage, in a transparent manner as possible, with the federal, state and local employees that are using these tools to get their input, ideas and concerns. This is a community with no end to thoughtful, innovative leaders… and listening to them will benefit everyone.
I can’t stress the importance of this enough. Twitter fosters engagement, so the Gov Liaison should be blowing it up with AWESOME, connecting with folks like the ones Andrew mentions, the Gov 2.0 crowd, and anybody who has some insanely great ideas. You can bet your ass I’ll make this happen if I get the job. This is a great community to be a part of, and I would demand that level of engagement from Twitter.
2. Please use your position to help raise awareness about section 508 (accessiblity for people with disabilities) so that EVERYONE can access Twitter. This includes having Twitter throw its weight around, when possible, to get 3rd party services to develop compliant and accessible services and add-ons.
I actually need to get a lot smarter about 508 and really get an understanding for how this affects government leaders and workers in the workplace. I do think there’s something to be said for Twitter using its throw-weight to push policy and legislative change where needed. This is something I’ve found way too many companies in DC unwilling to do.
3. Please make sure to devote enough attention to state and local government concerns. Some of the best and most innovative uses of social media are at the local level and I firmly believe that social media is most powerful when it reinforces and enhances existing (in real life) connections.
This would be a hallmark of my work if I got this job. I got jazzed seeing all the cool hyperlocal innovations from state and local folks at the Gov 2.0 Expo a couple weeks ago. But I think the federal government could act as a change agent to help more communities adopt Twitter for innovative local use. We’ve just got to educate some people and get some others voted out of office.
4. Please make (or work with the Library of Congress to make) an archiving and access tool that would be truly useful for government employees and, in particular, policy makers.
Done. I too want to see quick and easy access to all of Twitter’s data when anyone wants it, anytime. I’ve participated in some research projects in the past where my team designed analytics to run on captured tweets, and the hardest thing was just capturing the tweets in the first place. We need to figure out how to make that data access easy and available.
5. Please help establish a quick and transparent process to get “Verified” on government accounts.
This is a must and a quick fix, in my opinion. Especially if the Gov Liaison duties are getting govvies on Twitter in the first place, we should be able to verify very fast.
6. Please create a public directory (perhaps with some associated metrics) of federal, state and local accounts
Does this already exist somewhere? I know I’ve seen sites like Govloop and GovTwit try to list tweeting govvies, but I’m not sure it’s comprehensive (especially at the state and local levels). I bet we could police that up pretty easy with verfied govvie accounts and develop lists. This may even help folks understand the Byzantine organization of our government.
7. Please develop some more robust off-the-shelf metrics to help measure engagement. Facebook Insights would be one model for this and perhaps access could be tied to verified government accounts.
I’m guessing Andrew wants to measure the engagement stats on govvies? That’s a pretty interesting method for accountability. Having spent some time helping develop algorithms to measure influence on Twitter, and now seeing easy-to-use, free measurement tools hit the web (like Edelman’s TweetLevel), I think it’s important that we use commonly available and individually modifiable tools versus sinking money into colossal objective systems. The latter way leads to government pork like Future Combat Systems. What Twitter could do is start organizing the creators of some of these tools and promoting specific accountability measures tailored to the agency or politician of choice.
8. Please be available when emergencies occur to help government use Twitter in the most effective manner possible. AND publicly post lessons learned, best practices, a related archive of tweets and possibly links to any relevant research on the issue.
I think the Gov Liaison should be more than just available. I think he should be the point man for such issues. There are tons of lessons to be learned from the State Department’s engagement with Twitter, lessons that Twitter itself could take a leadership role in collecting and publicizing.
9. Please expand your government cases studies beyond the USGS to highlight best practices by school districts, local governments and state agencies, as well as federal agencies.
Totally agree. Like I mentioned above, there are tons of case studies to be made from State’s AWESOME work, San Antonio’s traffic and transportation program, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation’s bus notification systems, and many others. It would have been great had I this job at the Gov 2.0 Expo, because I feel like there so many cool stories of local governments using Twitter to solve communication problems with their citizenry. Those stories would have made good captures, but it’s not too late!
10. Please partner with the Open311 standard to increase visibility of inter-governmental efforts to create a universal API for access to non-emergency services, and work with law enforcement and emergency services agencies on use of geo-location capabilities for emergency reporting and response.
Getting back to open government, this is definitely a partnership worth pursuing. Twitter’s value as an emergency response tool is, I believe, so far untapped despite being so promising. I have not read much about Open311, but I’ll start getting smarter on it ASAP.
There are some additional thoughtful ideas from some of Andrew’s commenters as well, like standardizing hashtags for specific gov agencies, engaging better with African American constituents on Twitter, and a wiki for best Twitter practices in government. Suffice to say, I don’t think any of these things are impossible. In fact, I think most of them are pretty easy to do if we can catalyze the right communities. I just hope I get selected as that catalyzer.
Since the announcement of Twitter’s Government Liaison job spec, the internet has lit up with discussions about the role. Many people are asking questions about the intent of this person’s work in DC. Is he a lobbyist? Is he an educator? Is he an ambassador?
I thought it would be important to share a few links to some of the blog posts, Twitter hashes, and other conversations happening on the web. Since I’m applying for this position, I see a lot of these discussions as marching orders for the role once it’s filled. Since government is indeed an artifice created by the people, for the people, then it’s people who should tell Twitter how they want their man in Washington to act.
Also, this list is a living one, so please send in your links via the comments section below.
Updated with additional links and commentary daily. Be sure to also check out the comments on Digiphile’s and Mark Drapeau’s Posterous articles: Sean Garrett has engaged with a lot of good feedback, and others have pushed back on Drapeau’s assertion that this hire is a waste of time and resources.
So I decided to do it: I applied for Twitter’s Government Liaison job.
Despite how much I’ve shat on government in the past, I’m really excited about the prospect of being “the Twitter guy” in DC. I have a lot of fun on Twitter. I like the short, true-to-life conversational aspect of the form. Twitter is such an ideal, simple cannon for quick, bite-sized bombs of AWESOME. All of us peeps in DC need a little more AWESOME, and I see Twitter as an objective delivery device more and more every day.
Now, this is a public policy position. It’s obvious from the job description that Twitter wants to develop an influential presence amongst policymakers in our fair government. There is a huge opportunity here to build some connective tissue between legislators, policymakers, commercial folks, a host of non-governmental organizations, state and local government, and citizens. I want to show Congress how AWESOME we can make our global communities. I want to show people some of the AWESOME things happening in government they never get to see or hear about. I want to connect with more people, more often, mo’ bettah.
Can Twitter provide that connective tissue? You bet your ass. And for those of you following me on Twitter, you know how much I love it. Twitter is AWESOME. It is insanely great, to use Umair Haque‘s manifesto. I want to show more people how to use it to help them achieve great things. That’s why I’ve put my hat into the ring for Twitter’s Government Liaison job.
But who just applies for a job and leaves it to fate? Not this guy.
I would LOVE having people’s support on this. If this isn’t worth doing big and AWESOME, it ain’t worth doing. So I’m asking for YOUR HELP. Here’s what we’ve gotta do:

Image courtesy of zoominfo.
I’ll start churning out thoughts, discussion, pingbacks, and other commentary that’s beginning to surface about Twitter’s entry into the gov arena here at Must. Be. AWESOME!!! Campaign Headquarters. To start, check out Andrew Wilson’s Top 10 Request for the New Twitter Gov Liaison. I’ll comment specifically on Andrew’s call to action in a subsequent post. Wouldn’t it be SUPERCOOL if this started as a simple job application but BLEW UP into a movement of some kind?
There’s probably someone insanely more qualified for this job, but I WANT IT. I want it like I want OASIS TO GET BACK TOGETHER. Like I want JOHN LENNON TO COME BACK FROM THE DEAD AND DO BATTLE WITH SARAH PALIN. This could be SO. COOL.
I hope you’re as excited about it as I am.
This job announcement from Twitter just went live. The salient bits are here:
Twitter is looking for an experienced, entreprenurial person to make Twitter better for policymakers, political organizations and government officials and agencies. You’ll be our first D.C. -based employee and the closest point of contact with a variety of important people and organizations looking to get the most out of Twitter on both strategic and highly tactical levels. You’ll help Twitter understand what we can do to better serve candidates and policymakers across party and geographical lines. You’ll support policymakers use of Twitter to help them communicate and interact with their constituents and the world. You’ll work with nearly every group at the company and at every level to pursue your vision for how Twitter ought to be. You’ll help set the culture and approach of a fledgling public policy department and be an important part of our very small company.

Image courtesy of zoominfo
I could totally do this. It’s actually the one thing that sounds insanely fun about working in DC: showing government folks how they can use Twitter for AWESOME purposes. Connecting legislators to their constituents (and each other). Connecting soldiers with families. Connecting. CONNECTING.
Even though I’m already gainfully employed and stretched thinner than Plastic Man in a God-sized tug-o-war… I am really giving some serious thought to applying for this gig.
What do y’all think??? Should I go for it?
These 3 boxes are widgets and can be edited through the admin page, just like the sidebar.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.